Member of Technical Staff, AI Research

Physical Superintelligence
Boston, MA
Hybrid

Who this role is best for

Best suited to AI researchers with a strong quantitative background working in physics and reinforcement learning domains, who can operate in a collaborative, systems-thinking environment with a focus on scalable infrastructure and scientific impact.

Best fit for

  • AI researchers with a physics or mathematics background and experience in reinforcement learning for complex reasoning tasks
    — “hands-on track record building agents and training models with reinforcement learning, ideally for science, mathematics, code, or other complex-reasoning domains”
  • Candidates who prioritize systems thinking and end-to-end delivery of AI systems for scientific discovery
    — “Ship working systems end-to-end, not isolated research artifacts”
  • Individuals with a proven ability to publish high-impact research in top ML venues and contribute to the field of AI for science
    — “Publish results that advance the field of AI for science”

Things to consider

  • Remote work is only considered on a case-by-case basis despite the remote option being listed
    — “We will consider remote candidates on a case-by-case basis”
  • Candidates must demonstrate a track record of recent top-tier publications and recognized original research
    — “PhD in machine learning, computer science, physics, mathematics, or a related quantitative field, with a track record of recent publications at top venues”

How to stand out

  • Highlight experience in designing reward structures and training curricula for discovery tasks
    — “Develop training curricula, reward structures, and architectures for discovery tasks”
  • Emphasize hands-on RL system development that has achieved measurable results against non-trivial baselines
    — “You have shipped working RL systems that beat non-trivial baselines”
  • Demonstrate fluency in distributed training frameworks and ability to scale models effectively
    — “You can move from a single GPU to a cluster without rewriting your code”
  • Showcase ability to collaborate with physicists and explain complex AI concepts in domain-specific contexts
    — “You can hold a substantive conversation with a domain physicist”
  • Include examples of interpretable AI systems or evaluation benchmarks for physics reasoning
    — “Distinguish genuine reasoning from pattern matching and benchmark gaming”
Pace · SteadyCollaboration · HighAutonomy · HighDecision Impact · Company

Derived from job-description analysis by Serendipath's career intelligence engine.

What success looks like

  • publishing research
  • developing training curricula
Typical background
PhD in machine learning, computer science, physics, mathematics

Skills & requirements

Required

Reinforcement LearningPhysics ReasoningTraining ModelsDistributed Training

Preferred

Modern RL AlgorithmsOpen-source Contributions

Stack & domain

Machine LearningComputer SciencePhysicsMathematicsReinforcement LearningPyTorchJAXDistributed TrainingCommunicationProblem-solvingLearning QuicklyStructured Troubleshooting ProcessesCollaborativeHigh-achievement CultureAI

About the role

Original posting from Physical Superintelligence via Ashby

OVERVIEW

Physical Superintelligence is a startup with roots at Google, NVIDIA, Harvard, Meta, MIT, Oxford, Johns Hopkins, Cambridge, and the Perimeter Institute building AI systems to discover new physics at scale. We are seeking AI researchers to build the agents and training systems that learn to do physics.

Our mission is to discover and commercialize transformative physics breakthroughs at scale with artificial superintelligence, safely, verifiably, and for broad public benefit.

The last century's golden age of physics gave us transistors, lasers, and nuclear energy. We believe artificial superintelligence will unlock the next one. We're creating the infrastructure to industrialize scientific discovery and usher in this new era.

We have one product: new physics, at scale.

ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES

  • Do original research on agents and training systems that learn to do physics, and publish it where it serves the mission.
  • Build what you research: training runs, evaluations and harnesses that ship as working systems, not isolated artifacts.
  • Go deep in one lane: reinforcement learning and post-training; agents, evaluation and verification; model architectures and training dynamics; scientific and generative modeling.
  • Work with the physicists who design verification harnesses and the engineers who build training infrastructure.

WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR

  • Three or more years of research experience, with recent publications at top venues (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, or comparable physics-ML venues). You can defend the result and you can name the claim you would retract.
  • Three or more years of hands-on research engineering with the modern ML stack: PyTorch or JAX, training and post-training frameworks, inference engines for rollouts, experiments run on multi-GPU clusters. You write research code that others reuse, and at least one system you built this way beat a non-trivial baseline and shipped as a working artifact rather than a notebook.
  • Depth in at least one of the following. We hire for one lane and expect you to work across the others:
  • Reinforcement learning and post-training: policy optimization, reward design, RLHF, RLVR, GRPO, RL for language models and for control.
  • Agents, evaluation and verification: tool use, long-horizon reasoning, memory and harnesses, evals, verifiers, reward models, instrumentation that separates reasoning from gaming.
  • Model architectures and training methods: transformers, state-space and graph models, neural operator and surrogate architectures for physical fields and meshes, scaling laws, optimization, training dynamics.
  • Scientific and generative modeling: learning from simulators, physics-informed and conservation-aware models, out-of-distribution behaviour, diffusion and generative models, code generation with checkable results.

NICE TO HAVE

  • A physics or mathematics background: you can hold a substantive conversation with a domain physicist.
  • Distributed training at cluster scale: single GPU to cluster without rewriting, and what breaks at each step.
  • Experience applying agents to simulators, scientific tools, games, or rigorous benchmark suites.
  • Open-source contributions or research artifacts the community has adopted.

HOW WE WORK

We hold a high technical bar and give people full ownership of their work, from spec to ship to on-call. We write contracts before logic, test against real systems instead of mocks, and favor simple designs that ship over clever ones that do not. Our development process is AI-native: we work with agentic coding tools daily, write specs that are legible to humans and agents alike, and lead with leverage.

LOCATION AND COMPENSATION

This role is hybrid, three days a week in person in our Cambridge, MA office. We will consider remote candidates on a case-by-case basis. We offer competitive compensation including salary, benefits, and meaningful early-stage equity. We evaluate on research depth, experimental rigor, systems fluency, and shipping velocity. We are an equal opportunity employer and value diverse perspectives in building platforms for AI-driven discovery.

Source: Physical Superintelligence careers (Ashby)

Similar roles

More roles at Physical Superintelligence